What is Bill 21 in BC?

Bill 21 proposes replacing the existing regulatory system (currently governed by the Law Society of BC and the Society of Notaries Public of BC) with a single, unified regulator. ]This body would oversee licensing, professional standards, education, complaints, and discipline for lawyers, notaries, and licensed paralegals—all under a unified regulatory framework. It would be responsible for licensing legal professionals, enforcing disciplinary actions, and setting consistent standards of practice across the board. 

The bill also calls for the creation of an Indigenous Council to advise on issues affecting Indigenous peoples and to promote Indigenous representation and advise the regulator on issues affecting Indigenous peoples. However, while the Council will play an important advisory role, its recommendations are not binding.

What would change under Bill 21 in BC?

To be clear, Bill 21 is not yet in force. If it’s implemented, however, it will lead to major changes to the regulation of legal professionals in BC:

1. A single regulator would be created to license and discipline lawyers, notaries, and paralegals.
2. Professional standards and codes of conduct would be unified across the three legal professions.
3. The new regulator would be overseen by a 17-member board; only five seats would be reserved for lawyers, and the rest would be for the public. 

One of the most significant implications of Bill 21 is its shift away from traditional self-regulation. Currently, lawyers in BC are regulated by a board of benchers elected by their peers. But under Bill 21, this system would be replaced by a publicly governed board. This change raises concerns about the independence of the legal profession.

Why is Bill 21 being introduced now?

One precursor to Bill 21 is the 2022 Cullen Commission Final Report, which investigated money laundering in BC. The Commission made several recommendations, including greater oversight and governance of legal professionals. These recommendations likely contributed to the push for the broader reforms proposed in Bill 21.

Additionally, the BC government has stated that Bill 21 is intended to increase access to justice, enhance transparency and accountability, and break down barriers between different types of legal service providers. By establishing a single regulator, the government aims to create a more streamlined, efficient, and inclusive legal system.

Arguments for legal profession reform

Given its bold proposals, Bill 21 has garnered a fair bit of controversy. There are compelling arguments on both sides of the debate. Proponents of the bill have made the following points: 

1. Public interest focus: Including non-lawyers in regulatory decision-making could make the profession less insular and more responsive to the public interest.
2. Streamlined regulation: Combining the oversight of lawyers, notaries, and paralegals could improve efficiency across all three professions.
3. Access to justice: Allowing paralegals to offer more legal services under a unified regulatory system could improve access to justice throughout BC, especially when it comes to vulnerable populations in underserved areas.
4. Consistent standards: Unified standards across legal professions could help ensure consistent quality in the delivery of legal services.

Despite these potential benefits, the bill has also sparked some strong opposition from within the legal community.

Watch How Canadian Law Firms Use Clio

Watch this walk-through to see why thousands of Canadian legal professionals use Clio’s leading cloud-based legal software.

Watch now

Arguments against legal profession reform

Critics of Bill 21 fear that the proposed reforms could threaten the core values of the legal profession in the following ways: 

1. Loss of self-regulation: Having fewer elected lawyers on the board could mark a shift away from the traditional model of self-regulation, raising concerns about the impact on professional independence.
2. Risk to professional independence: Critics argue that increased government control over the legal profession could blur the line between public oversight and political influence.
3. Lack of consultation: Many legal professionals and organizations have raised concerns that the consultation process was rushed and lacked transparency.
4. Governance concerns: Would a board dominated by non-lawyers have the expertise to effectively regulate the legal profession?

As Bill 21 is implemented, time will tell which arguments prove true—and how the government responds to any emerging challenges. 

Where does Bill 21 stand now?

Bill 21 received Royal Assent on May 16, 2024, making it officially law. However, implementation is expected to take between 18 and 24 months. During this transition, current regulators, like the Law Society, will remain in place.

As soon as the bill was announced, the legal community started pushing back. The Law Society declared it would launch a legal action challenge to the constitutionality of the Legal Professions Act. And they weren’t alone: the BC branch of the Canada Bar Association argued that the bill was passed in haste and warned that without an injunction or court order, the transition would take approximately 18 months. 

The Trial Lawyers Association of BC has also filed a legal challenge. Similar to the Law Society, they believe Bill 21 undermines the independence of the legal profession and was passed without meaningful consultation.

Although the government has already begun establishing transitional bodies—such as the Transitional Board and the Indigenous Council—ongoing legal challenges could delay or otherwise impact the full implementation of the law.

Bill 21 in BC: The future of legal regulation?

Despite its controversial nature, Bill 21 marks a significant turning point in the regulation of legal professionals in BC. It reflects growing demand for reform, driven by concerns around access to justice, public accountability, and inequities within society. At the same time, it raises critical questions about professional independence, governance, and how to strike the right balance between public oversight and self-regulation.

Wherever you stand on these issues, one thing is clear: Bill 21 isn’t just about BC. Other provinces are watching closely, and the outcomes of the law—whether positive or negative—are likely to shape the future of legal regulation across Canada. As the transition unfolds and legal challenges make their way through the courts, legal professionals in BC should stay informed, engaged, and prepared for what lies ahead. 

Change is never easy—especially in a profession built on tradition. This is as true for sweeping legal reforms as it is for adapting to new technologies. But change is also unavoidable. Bill 21 signals that the regulation of legal professionals is evolving. Whether these changes strengthen or undermine the legal system will depend on how they’re structured, challenged, and ultimately accepted.